Recently, while reading a novel, I came to that part in the book when all of the misunderstandings start arising. Up until then, it had been a very funny, but straightforward set of love stories. Most things were going in favor of all the major characters. Suddenly, there was a miscommunication. A prominent businessman who had collected a priceless (to him) small painting believed that a kind, jolly, heavy-set woman had stolen it from him. Since his brother seemed to be falling in love with this kind, jolly, heavy-set woman (with a history of shoplifting) this amounted to quite an inconvenient situation. While the reader, privy to all that is occurring, knows that the woman is not guilty, the reader cannot do anything about it. Instead, he or she must endure this agony of miscommunications, alternate explanations and misadventures that will lead the characters into a variety of unnecessary situations.
As a reader, I found myself a tad bit frustrated. I wanted to barge into the novel, bring the two people that needed to communicate with each other into the same room, and tell them to talk it out until the situation was resolved. No need for these mishaps, these messy misunderstandings, all this confusion. As soon as this little glitch was cleared up, the brother would be free to fall in love, the businessman could find his painting, and the woman would not have to endure the awkwardness of unfounded accusation.
Then I got to thinking. If all these things were immediately cleared up, would there really be a story? I mean, as long as the characters are missing each other, there are things left unknown, there is agony of the heart, there is still a reason to keep reading. Once the discrepancies are cleared up and everyone is free to have a happy ending, it does not exactly make for interesting reading. Did I really want to read about all of the characters ambling towards their happy endings, free from obstruction, exempt from all trial? The answer was inevitably “no.” What is the sense of a story in which struggle is absent, the ending is not hard-won? All sense of victory and satisfaction would be gone. It would be, simply put, a boring read.
I have sometimes heard the analogy of our lives to stories. Recently, when reading Francis Schaeffer’s Art and the Bible, I was struck by his statement that the greatest work of art that a Christian accomplishes is the life that he or she lives. How great would this work of art be, this great and elaborately woven story, if there was no strife or struggle? Being a “fixer,” I often want to jump to the quickest solution. I want to call the repairman, make the apology, send the email, and I want the situation to be resolved. Yet, when I step back from everything, I know that easy answers do not make good stories. Perhaps it is ok to live with a little bit of uncertainty, a little bit of heartbreak. Perhaps the moments of tension are those in which true character is revealed, personalities are tested, truth discovered, and convictions deepened. Perhaps it is friction which perfects us, trials that bring out the depths of who we are.
I composed this in my head today while running. There are trials in my life now that I desperately wish were resolved. There is tension in my heart, and hurt. However, as I look at the greater story, I catch a glimpse of beauty on the horizon. There is beauty even in the tragedy, for it is in the moments of tension that I find out what I am truly made of. These moments are when my story amplifies God’s glory the most. This gives me hope, opens my eyes to the greater reality. I look around me, and I give thanks. Are these yards not peppered with birds chirping and flittering? Is the sunshine not peering out and gracing my forehead with warmth? Is the world not full of wonder, after all?
“For our present troubles are small and won’t last very long. Yet they produce for us a glory that vastly outweighs them and will last forever!”
—2 Cor. 4:17